| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Nov | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
Remember that senseless persecution that was tossed out of District court in about 45 minutes?
Remember how the LTISD continued their reckless waste of our tax dollars to appeal their fabricated “abuse of governmental processes?”
Speaking of “polishing a turd!” Have you read the latest LTISD response to my web site comments regarding their loss. Not to mention their wasteful expenditure of OUR tax dollars? In the end, the LTISD only makes a bigger mess and they end up smelling really bad.
So says Christopher B. Gilbert, of the law firm of Bracewell & Giuliani. He said so during oral arguments before the Third Court of Appeals in the continuation of the district’s earlier loss in District Court.
The August 2, 2007 edition of the Lake Travis View has an excellent article written by Charles McClure regarding the LTISD and their wasteful use of tax dollars to persecute my family. The article “LTISD appealing Lovelace ruling in federal court” can be found on the front page. Unfortunately, the LT View does not have a web site so that I can link to the article, but I will quote some relevant points out to you:
The LTISD complains about the cost of self inflicted PIA costs and here they go again wasting our money on answers to a reporters PIA requests?
Why does the LTISD feel it necessary to spend your tax dollars employing lawyers to answer information that should be public?
Due to an “inadvertent” error on the part of the district’s in-house legal counsel, Susan Bohn, I have been provided a copy of the unredacted legal bills related to the failed lawsuit brought by the LTISD against me. It makes for great reading. Way to go Susan!TPIA
The attorney’s for the LTISD have failed to follow the Texas Attorney General’s guidance regarding FERPA (remember, FERPA, The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, federal law concerning privacy and confidentiality). The AG’s office made this fact known to the lawyers who represent the LTISD as early as September 11, 2006 by means of an opinion letter. During a complaint hearing about this matter, the attorney for the LTISD stated that they were only made aware of this ruling in September 2006. Yet it was this same attorney who later failed to follow the ruling in which she had previously acknowledged.
